Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims

نویسندگان

  • William Thomson
  • Chun-Hsien Yeh
چکیده

We consider the problem of allocating some amount of an infinitely divisible and homogeneous resource among agents having claims on this resource that cannot be jointly honored. A “rule” associates with each such problem a feasible division. Our goal is to uncover the structure of the space of rules. For that purpose, we study “operators” on the space, that is, mappings that associate to each rule another one. Duality, claims truncation, and attribution of minimal rights are the operators we consider. We first establish a number of results linking them. Then, we determine which properties of rules are preserved under each of these operators, and which are not. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. JEL classification: C79; D63; D74

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

2011 / 71 A unifying framework for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims Jens

In a recent paper, Thomson and Yeh [Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims, Journal of Economic Theory 143 (2008) 177-198] introduced the concept of operators on the space of rules for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims. They focussed on three operators in order to uncover the structure of such a space. In this paper, we generalize their analysis upon presenting and st...

متن کامل

UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER Operators for the Adjudication of Conflicting

We consider the problem of dividing some amount of an infinitely divisible and homogeneous resource among agents having claims on this resource that cannot be jointly honored. A “rule” associates with each such problem a feasible division. Our goal is to uncover the structure of the space of rules. For that purpose, we study “operators” on the space, that is, mappings that associate to each rul...

متن کامل

Application of the Bankruptcy Theory and Conflicting Claims on Water Resources Allocation of Zayanderud

Solving the Water conflict and optimal allocation of common water resources are the most important service of cooperative game theory to water economics. Zayandehrud basin is the most important disputed basin in several neighboring provinces in the first class basin of Iran's central plateau. The purpose of this research is to use the game theory with application of Bankruptcy approach (conflic...

متن کامل

Claims and Jurisdictions in Medical Matters Disputes

Medical claims are all disputes that are somehow related to the medical and related matters so its subject is wide-ranging. These are civil, criminal and diciplinair medical cases, and due to the multy natures of such cases, we are likely to see numerous authorities to them. Furthermore, here expert medical expertise and expert opinion play an important role, but the rules are somewhat conflict...

متن کامل

Group order preservation and the proportional rule for the adjudication of conflicting claims

We investigate the existence of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims satisfying ‘group order preservation’: given two groups of claimants, suppose that the sum of the claims of the members of the first group is greater than or equal to the sum of the claims of the members of the second group. Then, similar inequalities should hold for the sums of the awards to the members of the two...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • J. Economic Theory

دوره 143  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008